Calculation of results
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This content was generated by artificial intelligence. To request a review, please email documentacao_se@softexpert.com
Presentation
See how SoftExpert Competência calculates competency scores using evaluation items, the employee's performance percentage in evaluations, and the employee's performance result in the consensus evaluation:
Calculation based on the highest score on the scale
In this case, to obtain a collaborator's level, the system performs the following calculation:
((((100 x Score of the assessed level) / Score of the highest level on the scale) x Competency weight ) + ... ) / Sum of the competency weights).
Example:
Consider a leadership evaluation where the employee was assessed based on their competencies:
Competence |
Proficiency level |
Grade rated |
maximum score on the scale |
Weight |
Coaching |
Good |
8 |
10 |
1 |
Communication |
Regular |
7 |
10 |
2 |
Conflict resolution |
Excellent |
40 |
50 |
1 |
Performance level calculation - Leader evaluation | |
|
Values - Coaching Values - Communication Values - Conflict resolution |
(((100* 8 )/ 10 )* 1 ) + (((100* 7 )/ 10 )* 2 ) + (((100* 40 )/ 50 )* 1 )/4 ((800/10)*1) + ((700/10)*2) + ((4000/50)*1)/4 (80*1) + (70*2) + (80*1))/4 (80+140+80)/4 75 |
The percentage shown for the employee's level in the leader evaluation will be 75% .
Calculation basis by mapped level
To determine an employee's level, the system performs the following calculation:
((((100 X Grade of the assessed level) / Grade of the mapped level) X Competency weight ) + ... ) / Sum of the competency weights).
Example:
Consider a leadership evaluation where the employee was assessed based on their competencies:
Competence |
Proficiency level |
Grade rated |
Mapped level grade |
Weight |
Coaching |
Good |
8 |
8 |
1 |
Communication |
Regular |
7 |
5 |
2 |
Conflict resolution |
Excellent |
40 |
40 |
1 |
Performance level calculation - Leader evaluation | |
|
Values - Coaching Values - Communication Values - Conflict resolution |
(((100* 8 )/ 8 )* 1 ) + (((100* 7 )/ 5 )* 2 ) + (((100* 40 )/ 40 )* 1 )/4 ((800/8)*1) + ((700/5)*2) + ((4000/40)*1)/4 (100*1) + (140*2) + (100*1))/4 (100+280+100)/4 120 |
The percentage shown for the employee's level in the leader evaluation will be 120%.
Consensus calculation
To obtain the employee's performance level in the consensus evaluation (performance result), the system performs a series of calculations:
- Consensus on the competency assessment item: ((assessment score 1 * weight of assessment 1) + (assessment score 2 * weight of assessment 2) / sum of assessment weights)
- Competency consensus with assessment item: ((result of the consensus on item 1 * weight of item 1) + (result of the consensus on item 2 * weight of item 2) / sum of the weights of the items)
- Competency consensus without assessment item: ((assessed score 1 * weight of assessment 1) + (assessed score 2 * weight of assessment 2) / sum of assessment weights)
- Consensus of evaluations: ((consensus result for competency 1 * weight of competency 1) + (consensus result for competency 2 * weight of competency 2) / sum of competency weights)
Example 1:
Consider an evaluation plan cycle, consisting of 3 evaluations: Self-evaluation, Leader, and Automatic Consensus.
In the evaluation plan cycle, it was configured that a specific weight will be used for each type of evaluation:
- Self-assessment: 1
- Leader: 2
Consider the Communication competency, weighted at 15, which includes the Ability and Attitude assessment items.
The employee was evaluated as follows during the assessments:
Self-assessment: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment item
|
Proficiency level |
Notice |
Weight |
Ability |
Regular |
5 |
7.5 |
Attitude |
Good |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Leader | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment item
|
Proficiency level |
Notice |
Weight |
Ability |
Regular |
5 |
7.5 |
Attitude |
Good |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Calculation - Ability | |
|
Item rating in Self-Assessment: 5.0 Self-Assessment Weight: 1 Item score in Leader evaluation: 7.5 Leader evaluation weight: 2 |
( 5.0 * 1 ) + ( 7.5 * 2 ) / ( 1 + 2 ) 5 + 14 / 3 Consensus score = 6.33 |
Calculus - Attitude | |
|
Item score in Self-Assessment: 7.5 Self-Assessment Weight: 1 Item score in Leader evaluation: 10 Leader evaluation weight: 2 |
( 7.5 * 1 ) + ( 10 * 2 ) / ( 1 + 2 ) 7.5 + 20 / 3 Consensus score = 9.16 |
At the point of consensus, the system will assign the following scores to the items:
- Ability: 6.33
- Attitude: 9.16
The consensus score for this competency will be: 7.74 .
Consider the competency "Conflict resolution," which does not have any assessment items.
Assessment |
Proficiency level |
Notice |
Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
Self-assessment |
Good |
8.0 |
1 |
Leader |
Excellent |
9.0 |
1 |
Calculus - Conflict resolution | |
|
Item score in Self-Assessment: 8.50 Self-Assessment Weight: 1 Item score in Leader evaluation: 9.0 Leader evaluation weight: 2 |
( 8.0 * 1 ) + ( 9.0 * 2 ) / ( 1 + 2 ) 8.0 + 18 / 3 Consensus score = 8.66 |
Calculation - Performance Level (Consensus) | |
|
Communication competency consensus: 7.74 Communication competency weight: 15 Conflict resolution competency score: 8.66 Weight of the Conflict Resolution competency: 1 |
( 7.74 * 15 ) + ( 8.66 * 1 ) / ( 15 + 1 ) * 10) (116.1 + 8.66 / 16)*10 7.79 * 10 Consensus score = 7.79 Performance level in consensus assessment: 77.9% |
The consensus score for this competency will be: 8.66 .
The employee's performance level in this evaluation will be 77.9 %.
Example 2:
Consider that the evaluation cycle mentioned in "Example 1" consists of 4 evaluations: Self-evaluation, Peers, Leader, and Automatic Consensus.
In the evaluation plan cycle, it was configured that a specific weight will be used for each type of evaluation:
- Self-assessment: 1
- Pairs: 2
- Leader: 3
Consider that 2 evaluators conducted the peer evaluation of the employee. The employee was evaluated on the Conflict Resolution competency as follows:
Evaluator |
Competency level |
Notice |
|---|---|---|
John |
Regular |
7.5 |
Mary |
Good |
8.5 |
To obtain the overall score for a competency in a multi-rater assessment, the scores for that competency must be added together and divided by the number of raters.
In this case, the score for the competency in the peer assessment will be: 8.0 .
The consensus score for the competency will be: 7.16 .
Calculus - Conflict Resolution (Peer Assessment) | |
|
John's competency score: 7.5 Mary's competency score: 8.5 Number of peer reviewers: 2 |
(( 7.5 + 8.5 ) / 2 ) 16 / 2 Consensus score = 8 |
Calculation - Performance Level (Consensus) | |
|
Score for competency in the self-assessment: 8.0 Self-Assessment Weight: 1 Score for competency in peer assessment: 8.0 Peer review weight: 2 Score for competence in the Leader evaluation: 9.0 Leader evaluation weight: 3 |
(8.0 + 8.0 + 27) / 6 43 / 6 Consensus score = 7.16 |
- If the "Use specific weight by assessment type" option is not enabled in the assessment plan, the calculations above will still be valid, however, a weight of 1 will be considered for all assessments.
- If the consensus is manual, when accessing the evaluation screen, the competencies and items will be calculated by the system (as per the calculations shown above), according to the edits made by the evaluator.
Conclusion
Done! Now you can understand how SoftExpert Competência calculates the results of performance evaluations. Therefore, you can simply view the performance results.






